In Gomel, a 17-year-old guy who killed a classmate was sentenced
The teenager killed his peer with a kitchen knife right during class.
In Gomel, a verdict was delivered in the case of the murder of a 17-year-old student of a road-building college. His classmate, who fatally wounded the teenager with a knife, was found sane, Onliner.by writes.
The tragedy occurred on March 25 in the college workshop. During a conflict, one of the students stabbed his classmate. The victim died in the hospital.
The investigation found that the teenagers had been in conflict for a long time. Despite this, they were assigned to the same subgroup during their practical training.
The trial began on September 11 and, at the prosecutor's request, was held behind closed doors. The accused was found guilty of murder (part 1 of article 139 of the Criminal Code) and sentenced to eight years in a penal colony.
In addition, he must pay the victim's side 70 thousand rubles as compensation for moral damages.
Now reading
"Around 70% of Russian visitors turned out to be 'vatniks'." Ex-guide from the Museum of the Great Patriotic War, detained by his own tour group, is now popular in Warsaw — we talked to him 12
"Around 70% of Russian visitors turned out to be 'vatniks'." Ex-guide from the Museum of the Great Patriotic War, detained by his own tour group, is now popular in Warsaw — we talked to him
Tsikhanouski ironizes about his wife: Lukashenka helps and cares for her, even when there was a threat to children, all information was passed to Poland 7676
Comments
Я не вывучаў права і даследваў яго. Гэта не мая сфера дзейнасці.
З некаторых часоў адчуваю нейкую незадаволенасць тэрміналогіяй.
Пракурор - хто гэта?
Старана абвінавачання у судовым працэсе, ці прадстаўнік надзорнага органа?
Хто быў ініцыятарам закрытасці працэса? Абвінаваўца?
Якія аргументы былі у ініцыятара закрытасці працэса?
Якую, прыкладам, дзяржаўную таямніцу маглі парушыць на гэтым судовым працэсе?
Вядома толькі пра месца навучання забойцы і ахвяры. Аніякіх іншых персанальных дадзеных бакоў не агучваецца.
Чым аргументаваў ініцыятар закрытасці сваё патрабаванне?
Чаму суддзя падтрымаў гэтае патрабаванне?
Ёсць нешта у беларускім заканадаўстве, што дазваляе закрыць працэс з-за узросту абвінавачанага?
Ці гэта проста паслуга супрацоўнікам і адміністрацыі каледжа?