"Accusations remain unsubstantiated." Mamaeva responded to Zazulyanskaya
Mamaeva appealed for an independent investigation to the Commission on National and Regional Security and the Ethical Commission of the KC.
Coordinating Council delegate Alyaksandra Mamaeva responded to accusations previously voiced in a comment to "Nasha Niva" by her colleague from the "European Choice" list, Volha Zazulyanskaya. Mamaeva rejects the claims, stating that no concrete evidence has been presented to her, and has appealed for an independent investigation to the Commission on National and Regional Security and the Ethical Commission of the KC.
We remind that last week, "European Choice" passed a vote of no confidence in Mamaeva. According to Zazulyanskaya, the main reason was security concerns — allegedly "repeated breaches of confidentiality," "unauthorized copying and transfer of confidential information to third parties," as well as the presentation of collective work as personal. Zazulyanskaya claims there is evidence, but the list refused to make it public, citing people's security.
Mamaeva asserts that she has not been given specifics: exactly which messages and materials, concerning which people, to whom, and under what circumstances she allegedly transferred them. According to her, neither she, nor the Security Commission, nor the Ethical Commission has received such evidence – and without it, she believes, the accusations remain unsubstantiated.
The Commission on National and Regional Security of the KC, according to Mamaeva, explained that the storage or forwarding of internal materials can be considered a security violation only when done to transfer information to those without official access, or for public dissemination to the detriment of the structure. The recording of individual messages or screenshots is considered permissible if a person does so for the purpose of protecting their reputation, documenting internal violations, or appealing to the Ethical Commission, the Security Commission, or the competent authorities of the country of residence.
Under the guise of "confidentiality," Mamaeva believes they are effectively trying to prevent her from defending herself. She also points out an internal contradiction: if the entire meeting was "absolutely confidential," then the list itself had no right to be the first to publicly announce the vote of no confidence and the formulations about "precautions in the interests of security."
Mamaeva denies the accusations of appropriating collective work. According to her, all reports — regarding the Contact Group, the delegation's work in PACE, the activities of the International Commission — she always sent to colleagues for approval and additions and never received a single official complaint regarding authorship from them. Here, she says, "there is no specific aggrieved person, no specific document, no specific situation."
Alyaksandra Mamaeva was a delegate of the KC of the third convocation and headed the International Commission of the KC, participating in the creation of People's Embassies of Belarus; she has lived in Slovenia since 2015. In November 2025, she reported attempts by the KGB to recruit her.
Comments